Why design is where accessibility is decided
Accessibility is often treated as a testing activity: build the product, run an audit, fix what fails. That approach is expensive and never really finishes, because the same failures are created again with every new feature.
Look at the most common failures on the web and a pattern appears. WebAIM's 2026 analysis of the top one million home pages found low-contrast text on 83.9%, missing image alt text on 53.1%, missing form labels on 51%, empty links on 46.3% and empty buttons on 30.6% - and those categories account for 96% of all detected errors. Nearly every one starts as a design decision: a palette choice, a form layout without visible labels, an icon-only button, a link that says "click here".
WCAG-informed design means making those decisions correctly in the first place, and building them into the design system so they stay correct.
My practice here comes from real delivery: contributing to WCAG A/AA/AAA accessibility for a major banking client's platform, and rebuilding an AI enterprise brand's colour system where testing found a pairing in use at 2.37:1 and the rebuilt primary pairing reached 17.26:1.



